The war that should have been avoided - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

The war that should have been avoided

Only Trump has leverage with both Netanyahu and Tehran. He must use it

After years of threats and posturing, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has finally backed his rhetoric and launched a large-scale military assault against Iran. Waves of Israeli air strikes have targeted the Islamic republic’s nuclear programme — striking Natanz, one of its main uranium enrichment plants — and its missile factories, and killed two top military commanders.

The veteran Israeli leader says his goal is to prevent the regime acquiring nuclear weapons, which Israel has long considered an existential threat. But by launching such a devastating assault on Iran he is igniting the full-blown war the world has feared since Hamas’s horrific October 7 2023 attack triggered regional hostilities.

He is gambling with the fate of the Middle East when the focus should be on US diplomatic efforts to secure a deal with Iran to curb its nuclear activities. But Netanyahu has long sought military action over diplomacy. It is difficult to see how the indirect talks between Washington and Tehran survive.

Tehran, ever more vulnerable and backed into a corner, is more likely to retaliate than negotiate in a bid to raise the stakes. That increases the risk of US troops being dragged into combat and conflict spilling over borders if the Islamic regime fears for its survival.

The world is rightly fearful. Oil prices jumped amid fears that Iran could seek to disrupt the flow of crude through the Strait of Hormuz or target energy assets in Gulf states. This would inflict more pain on an uneasy global economy. More important is the potential devastation of yet more war in a region that has endured 20 months of the most destructive and deadly conflict in decades.

Israel’s European allies and Gulf leaders must use whatever influence they have to try to rein Netanyahu in and bring Iran back to the table. The key here is the US president, the one leader with significant leverage over Israel. Donald Trump returned to the White House promising to end the war in Gaza and bring peace to the Middle East. But on his watch, an emboldened Netanyahu has escalated the offensive in Gaza and now opened an even bigger front.

In public, Trump has said he prefers a deal to resolve the nuclear crisis and US officials have insisted they had no part in the first day of Israeli assault. But he seems to have acquiesced to Netanyahu’s assault. On Friday, Trump warned Iran of “even more brutal” attacks, as he urged Tehran to “make a deal”. He noted that a 60-day deadline he gave the republic to reach an accord had passed, while saying “now they have, perhaps, a second chance!”

Trump may have calculated that he can use Israel to pressure Tehran to give up its nuclear programme. He may discover that Netanyahu has used him to drag the US into a war with Iran.

The Islamic regime, facing its gravest threat in decades, should grab whatever diplomatic rope still exists. For too long, it has wilfully ignored the urgency of the world’s concern over its nuclear programme, provocatively expanding its stockpile of uranium enriched close to weapons-grade levels to become a nuclear threshold state. A malign influence across the region, it must realise its path is unsustainable and be willing to compromise to reach a nuclear deal.

But Trump, too, has a chance to show responsible leadership. The roots of the crisis can be traced to his flawed decision in 2018 to withdraw the US unilaterally from an accord that severely limited Iran’s nuclear activities, and with which it was complying. He must realise that it is in his and America’s interests to bring this conflict to a swift end. That means holding back Netanyahu with genuine threats of consequences. Being a friend to Israel should not mean giving Netanyahu a carte blanche to wage endless wars that keep the Middle East, including Israel itself, in turmoil.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美联储会违背特朗普的意愿加息吗?

《市场前瞻》是英国《金融时报》对未来一周市场的指南。

“特朗普主义”促成金砖国家峰会罕见团结

这个历来难以团结的集团,在海湾战争、关税和美国制裁的担忧下轻松达成共识。

即将到来的无人驾驶出租车革命

如果能赢得公众信任,自动驾驶汽车或将改变城市交通。

美国施压多边开发银行放弃气候融资目标

预计多边贷款机构将效仿世界银行,放弃绿色目标。

为什么我这个非亿万富翁不离开英国

既然英国配得上哈里和梅根、贝叶挂毯以及黄脚亚洲大黄蜂,也就配得上我。

“数据中心巷”的内战

弗吉尼亚州威廉王子县一座拟建的数据中心园区让邻居们产生分歧。这场争端为全国反思美国景观问题定下了基调。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×