The Iran war dilemma for central bankers - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

The Iran war dilemma for central bankers

What happened after the pandemic is an imperfect guide for the latest shock
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.4,"text":"The Iran war has put central bankers in a bind. Nobody knows how long shipping in the Strait of Hormuz will remain disrupted for, and in turn how high global energy prices could ultimately rise. Households and businesses are, however, already feeling the pinch from dearer domestic fuels. Data released on Tuesday showed that annual growth in the US consumer price index jumped to 3.8 per cent in April, its highest in three years, and up from 2.4 per cent in February. "}],[{"start":34.45,"text":"If rate setters act too soon to contain inflationary pressures by raising the cost of credit, they risk adding insult to economic injury. If they hold steady to see how the conflict develops, there is a risk of waiting too long. Then they could be blamed for a surge in prices, similar to what happened in the aftermath of the pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. That said, central bankers are also aware that monetary policy is a rather blunt instrument for guiding prices through a volatile shock to energy supplies."}],[{"start":67.4,"text":"The strategy, so far, among major central banks has been to bide time. But the longer the conflict goes on, the more patience will thin, and the more hawkish policymakers will become. Last week, the Reserve Bank of Australia and Norges Bank bucked the trend by raising rates. And at their meetings last month the US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank and Bank of England conveyed growing concern about the pass-through of higher energy costs into the economy. Kevin Warsh, who is set to replace outgoing Fed chair Jay Powell this week, will face stiff resistance from a Federal Open Market Committee that is anxious about inflation if he pushes for a rate cut to appease US President Donald Trump."}],[{"start":111.10000000000001,"text":"The worried hawks ought to be taken seriously. Rich nations are less dependent on fossil fuels than in decades past but the war — which has triggered the largest oil supply shock in history — has already led to a notable rise in prices. In the US, a net energy exporter, petrol costs have jumped over 50 per cent. The latest price shock could also lead to a longer-lasting jump in inflation expectations, particularly in the US and UK where central banks have struggled to get price growth sustainably back to their 2 per cent targets in recent years."}],[{"start":147.10000000000002,"text":"Nonetheless, concerns that policymakers are at risk of repeating the mistakes of 2022 — when central banks tightened too late and inflation surged — should be kept in perspective. Circumstances are different this time. Then, economies were rebounding from lockdowns and stimulated by generous policy support. Right now, economic momentum looks weaker and fiscal support has, sensibly, been more muted. Rising energy prices are also crimping demand, which could help contain inflation. A higher cost of credit on top, then, risks squeezing economies excessively. Similarly, job markets in the US and Europe contain more slack today, which means that higher inflation expectations are less likely to trigger an upward ratchet in wages and prices. Interest rates, too, are much less accommodative than they were in the aftermath of the pandemic. "}],[{"start":201.8,"text":"For now, then, it makes sense for the Fed, BoE and ECB to continue their holding pattern, with hawkish messaging to help keep a lid on inflation expectations. Policymakers will need to monitor closely how much the conflict is suppressing demand, and how quickly higher energy costs are feeding into broader price pressures. At the same time, they must keep tabs on developments in the strait, and the risk of under-pressure governments being forced into providing more cost of living support. Like everyone else, central bankers are trying to navigate through an economic outlook obscured by the fog of war in the Middle East."}],[{"start":246.2,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1778643157_3990.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

温水煮青蛙式的美国债务危机

不断上升的赤字和偿债成本似乎已不再具有让财政恢复审慎的力量。

巴西昔日石棉小镇期待稀土带来新活力

位于巴西腹地深处的小镇米纳苏,成为美国在稀土领域摆脱中国主导地位计划的关键部分。

Z世代用TikTok拯救父母的时装店

Z世代用TikTok等社交媒体为父母经营的时装店吸引年轻顾客,帮助其走出困境。

加拿大企业担心特朗普关税引发“下行压力漩涡”

美加贸易战再起,与美国有业务往来的加拿大企业承受痛苦,面临不确定性。

FT社评:美财政部干预债券市场只是权宜之计

贝森特在日元和长期债券方面的举措,只能暂时缓解问题,无法解决政策可信度不足和债务过高的问题。

Lex专栏:希音首次公开募股推介应更多借鉴Meta而非H&M

它的竞争对手不只是服装零售商,还应包括任何为沉迷屏幕的用户带来多巴胺刺激的企业。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×