Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

特朗普能源部长称美国页岩油在低油价下仍能继续开采

赖特声称,即使原油价格如政府所建议的那样跌至每桶50美元,该行业也可以提高产量。
6小时前

人工智能热潮引领美国风投狂飙至三年新高

投资者对快速发展的人工智能技术感到兴奋,今年出现了一轮大规模融资潮。

马克•卡尼能否赢得加拿大大选和与美国的贸易战?

这位前中央银行行长在经济方面资历深厚,但在政治上却未经考验。

欧元与美元平价是否已经不再可能?

许多投资者认为,特朗普终究将要兑现对欧洲的关税威胁。
9小时前

日本经济产业大臣赴美寻求关税豁免

随着钢铝关税逼近,以及特朗普公开质疑美日长期防务协议,日本经济产业大臣武藤容治周一前往美国,寻求提出“双赢”解决方案。

全球最大矿商削减勘探投资

尽管自2020年以来,在寻找对能源转型至关重要的金属方面的支出激增,但总投资仍有所下降。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×