EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc’s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

苹果推高了爱尔兰信用评级展望

事实证明,被迫接受苹果公司支付的130亿欧元欠税也是一件好事。

特朗普的内阁人选:当选总统政府的关键人物

美国政界对一些候选人感到震惊,他们仍需得到参议院的确认。

台积电获得116亿美元补贴,美国芯片法案面临不确定的未来

拜登政府正在推动在特朗普重新入主白宫之前分配资金。

俄罗斯遭西方制裁打击后,中国汽车在俄罗斯销量激增

随着俄罗斯人“用钱包投票”,从亚洲国家汽车制造商购买汽车的数量创下新纪录。

詹姆斯•戴森的农业业务为何面临1.2亿英镑遗产税威胁?

以吸尘器和吹风机闻名的亿万富翁已成为英国最大的农民之一。

弗里德里希•默茨:德国下一任总理的热门人选

这位基民盟领导人放弃了利润丰厚的商业生涯,现在正争取取代朔尔茨的位置。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×