The US Federal Reserve’s Trump problem - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
美国利率

The US Federal Reserve’s Trump problem

The president is undermining his own desire for lower interest rates
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.4,"text":"Last week was a particularly testing one for Jay Powell. Donald Trump resumed his criticism of the US Federal Reserve chair for not cutting interest rates faster by describing him as a “stupid person”. On Wednesday, US media reported that the president might nominate a new chair well before Powell’s term expires in May 2026. The White House later said no announcements were “imminent”, helping to quash a sell-off in the dollar. The rumours around his job rounded off a week that had started with other members of the Fed’s rate-setting committee pushing for cuts too."}],[{"start":46.449999999999996,"text":"If Trump wants rate cuts, his interventions and chaotic policy agenda are not helping his cause. For starters, should the president reveal his successor to Powell well before his term elapses, then it raises the worrying prospect of a “shadow Fed chair” who could signal a more dovish direction on rates from the sidelines. That would stoke confusion in markets, and distort the transmission of monetary policy. Right now it is also driving speculation of a loosening in the future policy stance. As recent market moves have shown, that weakens the dollar and boosts the case for higher rates at the margin."}],[{"start":88.47999999999999,"text":"Then there is the immediate uncertainty around the president’s tariff policies. At its meeting in mid-June, the Fed held rates at 4.25 to 4.5 per cent. But its policymakers were split on where they should go next. Recently two rate-setters — including Christopher Waller, a leading candidate to succeed Powell — said that the Fed ought to consider cuts as soon as next month. After all, there has been only a slight uptick in US inflation readings since the president’s April 2 tariff announcements. High rates are constraining growth. Credit card delinquencies are at their highest in over a decade and annual wage growth on job postings are at their joint lowest in four years."}],[{"start":137.45999999999998,"text":"But Powell’s caution is sensible. Data on Friday showed that in May annual growth in the core personal consumption expenditures index — the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation — rose to 2.7 per cent. Indeed, it is too early to judge the effects of tariffs on inflation. First, US businesses are still working through imported stockpiles. Price pressures from existing tariffs may not show up in the inflation numbers until the summer months. The Fed would then be in a better position to understand how higher duties are passing through supply chains."}],[{"start":176.29999999999998,"text":"Second, Trump’s full tariff package hasn’t even hit yet. It is unclear what duties will prevail beyond July 9, when the president’s deadline for trade partners to renegotiate his “liberation day” tariffs expires. When those levies take effect, they will push up prices further. The administration is also mulling additional sector-based tariffs. Other price pressures may build too. Global oil prices remain exposed to the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Trump’s tax-cutting “big beautiful bill” could add further price pressure."}],[{"start":213.57999999999998,"text":"If tariffs, the pass-through to consumers, and broader price shocks surprise to the upside then there is a risk of a sustained rise in inflation — not just a one-off jump in the price level. After all, Americans have experienced above-target price growth for over four years, and year-ahead inflation expectations remain elevated. But if the implementation of tariffs are delayed and uncertainty lingers, then demand may drop faster and thereby raise the case for cuts."}],[{"start":247.95999999999998,"text":"For now, keeping rates on hold feels like the safest option given all the uncertainty. But that means the risk of a policy mistake is high. If the central bank had more clarity on the extent and timing of tariffs — and the president’s broader agenda — it would be in a far better position to ascertain the risk of cutting rates sooner. The president will do well to realise that the dilemma the Fed faces is largely one of his own making."}],[{"start":285.62999999999994,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftmailbox.cn/album/a_1751243496_6489.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

为什么美国“有产者”也感受到了经济压力?

马斯特斯:从房屋保险到草坪养护,各项住房成本都在上涨,导致近半数美国房主在财务上捉襟见肘。

“希望这一切赶紧结束”:选举广告狂轰滥炸让美国选民厌倦

距离中期选举仅剩一周,两党候选人密集投放攻击性广告。而承受广告狂轰滥炸的是日益恼火的选民。

投资机构能大到不必在乎道德准则吗?

挪威政府正准备就其规模2.3万亿美元的主权财富基金在投资过程中应如何处理道德准则问题提交提案。

Lex专栏:Anthropic、Meta与K型公司

有影响力的股东与毫无影响力的股东之间的差距正在扩大。

iPhone Duo表现如何?

HTSI科技评测员称,这是“我见过的迄今为止最漂亮的折叠设备”。

FT社评:对冲AI热潮的局限

随着科技投资激增,投资者寻求保护的行动变得愈发迫切,也愈发困难。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×